|
|
|
|
AN ACT
|
|
relating to the dismissal of certain actions arising from exposure |
|
to asbestos and silica. |
|
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: |
|
SECTION 1. The heading to Section 90.007, Civil Practice |
|
and Remedies Code, is amended to read as follows: |
|
Sec. 90.007. MOTION TO DISMISS IN ACTION FILED ON OR AFTER |
|
SEPTEMBER 1, 2005. |
|
SECTION 2. Section 90.007(a), Civil Practice and Remedies |
|
Code, is amended to read as follows: |
|
(a) In an action filed on or after September 1, 2005 [the
|
|
date this chapter becomes law], if a claimant fails to timely serve |
|
a report on a defendant, or serves on the defendant a report that |
|
does not comply with the requirements of Section 90.003 or 90.004, |
|
the defendant may file a motion to dismiss the claimant's |
|
asbestos-related claims or silica-related claims. The motion must |
|
be filed on or before the 30th day after the date the report is |
|
served on the defendant. If a claimant fails to serve a report on |
|
the defendant, the motion must be filed on or before the 30th day |
|
after the date the report was required to be served on the defendant |
|
under Section 90.006. If the basis of the motion is that the |
|
claimant has served on the defendant a report that does not comply |
|
with Section 90.003 or 90.004, the motion must include the reasons |
|
why the report does not comply with that section. |
|
SECTION 3. Section 90.010, Civil Practice and Remedies |
|
Code, is amended by amending Subsection (d) and adding Subsections |
|
(d-1), (l), (m), (n), and (o) to read as follows: |
|
(d) In an action that was pending on August 31, 2005, [the
|
|
date this chapter becomes law] that was [is] transferred to and |
|
remains [or] pending in an MDL pretrial court, the [and in which the
|
|
claimant does not serve a report that complies with Section 90.003
|
|
or 90.004, the MDL pretrial court shall not dismiss the action
|
|
pursuant to this chapter but shall retain jurisdiction over the
|
|
action under the MDL rules. The] MDL pretrial court shall not |
|
remand such action for trial unless: |
|
(1) the claimant serves a report complying with |
|
Section 90.003 or 90.004; or |
|
(2)(A) the claimant does not serve a report that |
|
complies with Section 90.003 or 90.004; |
|
(B) the claimant serves a report complying with |
|
Subsection (f)(1); and |
|
(C) the court, on motion and hearing, makes the |
|
findings required by Subsection (f)(2). |
|
(d-1) Beginning on September 1, 2014, the MDL pretrial court |
|
shall dismiss each action for an asbestos-related injury or a |
|
silica-related injury that was pending on August 31, 2005, unless a |
|
report was served on or after September 1, 2013, that complies with |
|
Section 90.003, Section 90.004, or Subsection (f). The MDL |
|
pretrial court shall provide for the dismissal of such actions in a |
|
case management order entered for that purpose. All such actions |
|
shall be dismissed on or before August 31, 2015. |
|
(l) A dismissal under Subsection (d-1) is without prejudice |
|
to the claimant's right to file a subsequent action seeking damages |
|
arising from an asbestos-related injury or a silica-related injury. |
|
(m) This chapter and Section 16.0031 apply to a subsequent |
|
action for an asbestos-related injury or a silica-related injury |
|
filed by a claimant whose action was dismissed under Subsection |
|
(d-1) or by a claimant in an action described by Subsection (d) who |
|
voluntarily dismissed the action under Section 90.008. |
|
(n) If a claimant subsequently refiles an action for an |
|
asbestos-related injury or a silica-related injury that was |
|
dismissed under Subsection (d-1), the refiled action is treated for |
|
purposes of determining the applicable law as if that claimant's |
|
action had never been dismissed but, instead, had remained pending |
|
until the claimant served a report that complied with Section |
|
90.003, Section 90.004, or Subsection (f). |
|
(o) A claimant whose action was dismissed under Subsection |
|
(d-1) may serve the petition and citation for any subsequently |
|
filed action for an asbestos-related or silica-related injury by |
|
certified mail, return receipt requested, or other method approved |
|
by the MDL pretrial court that is likely to accomplish service in a |
|
cost-effective manner, on a person who was a defendant in the |
|
dismissed action. |
|
SECTION 4. (a) Section 90.010, Civil Practice and Remedies |
|
Code, as amended by this Act, applies to an action pending in the |
|
multidistrict litigation pretrial court on, or referred to the |
|
multidistrict litigation pretrial court on or after, the effective |
|
date of this Act. |
|
(b) Nothing in this Act is intended to be regarded as a |
|
decision on the merits of a dismissed action, to affect the rights |
|
of any party in a bankruptcy proceeding, or to affect the ability of |
|
any person to satisfy the claim criteria for compensable claims or |
|
demands under a trust established pursuant to a plan of |
|
reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy |
|
Code (11 U.S.C. Section 1101 et seq.). With respect to the |
|
administrative dismissal of an action under Section 90.010(d-1), |
|
Civil Practice and Remedies Code, as added by this Act, the tort |
|
system rights of the dismissed actions are specifically preserved. |
|
SECTION 5. This Act takes effect September 1, 2013. |
|
|
|
______________________________ |
______________________________ |
|
President of the Senate |
Speaker of the House |
|
|
|
I certify that H.B. No. 1325 was passed by the House on April |
|
22, 2013, by the following vote: Yeas 145, Nays 0, 1 present, not |
|
voting. |
|
|
|
______________________________ |
|
Chief Clerk of the House |
|
|
|
I certify that H.B. No. 1325 was passed by the Senate on May |
|
8, 2013, by the following vote: Yeas 30, Nays 0. |
|
|
|
______________________________ |
|
Secretary of the Senate |
|
APPROVED: _____________________ |
|
Date |
|
|
|
_____________________ |
|
Governor |