This website will be unavailable from Friday, April 26, 2024 at 6:00 p.m. through Monday, April 29, 2024 at 7:00 a.m. due to data center maintenance.

 
 
  S.B. No. 631
 
 
 
 
AN ACT
  relating to venue for the disposition of stolen property.
         BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
         SECTION 1.  Article 47.01a, Code of Criminal Procedure, is
  amended by amending Subsections (a) and (d) and adding Subsection
  (e) to read as follows:
         (a)  If a criminal action relating to allegedly stolen
  property is not pending, a district judge, county court judge,
  statutory county court judge, or justice of the peace having
  jurisdiction as a magistrate in the county in which the property is
  held or in which the property was alleged to have been stolen or a
  municipal judge having jurisdiction as a magistrate in the
  municipality in which the property is being held or in which the
  property was alleged to have been stolen may hold a hearing to
  determine the right to possession of the property, upon the
  petition of an interested person, a county, a city, or the state.
  Jurisdiction under this article [section] is based solely on
  jurisdiction as a criminal magistrate under this code and not
  jurisdiction as a civil court. The court shall:
               (1)  order the property delivered to whoever has the
  superior right to possession, without conditions; [or]
               (2)  on the filing of a written motion before trial by
  an attorney representing the state, order the property delivered to
  whoever has the superior right to possession, subject to the
  condition that the property be made available to the prosecuting
  authority should it be needed in future prosecutions; or
               (3)  order the property awarded to the custody of the
  peace officer, pending resolution of criminal investigations
  regarding the property.
         (d)  Venue for a hearing under this article is in any
  justice, county, statutory county, or district court in the county
  in which the property is seized or in which the property was alleged
  to have been stolen or in any municipal court in any municipality in
  which the property is seized or in which the property was alleged to
  have been stolen, except that the court may transfer venue to a
  court in another county on the motion of any interested party.
         (e)  The person who has the superior right to possession of
  the property, as determined in a hearing under Subsection (a), is
  responsible for any transportation necessary to deliver the
  property to the person as ordered under that subsection.
         SECTION 2.  Article 47.02, Code of Criminal Procedure, is
  amended by amending Subsection (b) and adding Subsection (c) to
  read as follows:
         (b)  On written consent of the prosecuting attorney and
  following an order described by Subsection (a), any magistrate
  having jurisdiction in the county in which the property was alleged
  to have been stolen or, if the [a] criminal action for theft or any
  other offense involving the illegal acquisition of property is
  pending in another county, the county in which the action is pending
  may hold a hearing to determine the right to possession of the
  property.  If it is proved to the satisfaction of the magistrate
  that any person is a true owner of the property alleged to have been
  stolen, and the property is under the control of a peace officer,
  the magistrate may, by written order, direct the property to be
  restored to that person.
         (c)  The owner of the property is responsible for any
  transportation necessary to restore the property to the owner as
  ordered under this article.
         SECTION 3.  This Act takes effect September 1, 2017.
 
 
 
 
 
  ______________________________ ______________________________
     President of the Senate Speaker of the House     
 
         I hereby certify that S.B. No. 631 passed the Senate on
  May 8, 2017, by the following vote:  Yeas 31, Nays 0.
 
 
  ______________________________
  Secretary of the Senate    
 
         I hereby certify that S.B. No. 631 passed the House on
  May 24, 2017, by the following vote:  Yeas 146, Nays 0, two
  present not voting.
 
 
  ______________________________
  Chief Clerk of the House   
 
 
 
  Approved:
 
  ______________________________ 
              Date
 
 
  ______________________________ 
            Governor