LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
 
FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
 
March 17, 2015

TO:
Honorable Tan Parker, Chair, House Committee on Investments & Financial Services
 
FROM:
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
 
IN RE:
HB1454 by Raney (Relating to notice, reporting, and records requirements for holders of certain personal property that is or may be presumed abandoned.), As Introduced

The potential revenue loss from implementation of the bill cannot be determined at this time.

The bill would amend the Property Code to direct the holder of shares of a mutual fund and the holder of accounts, such as a checking or savings account, or the contents of a safe deposit box to request from the owner of those assets the name and physical or electronic mailing address of the owner's representative for the purpose of providing notification of presumed abandoned property. The bill would cease the running of the period for determining abandonment if the representative communicates to the holder that the representative knows the owner's location and that the owner exists and has not abandoned the asset.

The bill's provisions could potentially reduce the number of assets held by depositories considered to be abandoned and therefore reduce remittances of abandoned property to the Comptroller of Public Accounts. The remittances of abandoned or unclaimed property are deposited to the General Revenue Fund. According to the Comptroller of Public Accounts, there is no data upon which to estimate the number and value of accounts which would be affected by the designation of an owner's representative whose knowledge of the owner's location and retention of the assets would prevent funds from being presumed abandoned and therefore reported and delivered to the state. As a scenario, the agency indicated that if the bill causes the remittance of 25 percent of individual accounts and 50 percent of business accounts to be delayed, the loss to the General Revenue Fund could be $29.7 million in fiscal year 2016 and $30.9 million in fiscal year 2017.

Local Government Impact

No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.


Source Agencies:
304 Comptroller of Public Accounts
LBB Staff:
UP, CL, EP, LCO