BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 2826 |
By: Murphy |
Ways & Means |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
According to interested parties, when determining the eligibility of school district property in more than one district for a limitation on appraised value under the Texas Economic Development Act, single projects extending across multiple school districts are evaluated by each portion of the project, and each portion must separately qualify for a limitation agreement, sometimes posing a significant burden. C.S.H.B. 2826 seeks to address this issue.
|
||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 2826 amends the Tax Code to set out provisions applicable only to a single unified project that is located in more than one but not more than three school districts, each of which is contiguous to another school district in which the project is located and at least one of which is a school district to which provisions of the Texas Economic Development Act relating to a limitation on appraised value of certain property used to create jobs apply. The bill establishes that, for purposes of determining the required minimum amount of a qualified investment and the minimum amount of a limitation on appraised value with regard to such a project, the project is considered to be located in the school district in which the project is located that has the highest taxable value of property for the preceding tax year as determined by the comptroller of public accounts. The bill modifies the minimum amount of a limitation on appraised value to which a school district may agree by multiplying it by a fraction the numerator of which is the amount of qualified investment made in the school district in connection with the project and the denominator of which is the total amount of qualified investment made in connection with the project.
C.S.H.B. 2826 requires the comptroller, in determining whether property on which a project is located meets the requirements for eligibility for a limitation on appraised value, to consider whether the project as a whole would meet those requirements were the project located at one site in a single school district. The bill establishes that these provisions affect neither the requirement that each school district from which an applicant desires a limitation on appraised value of the applicant's property for school district maintenance and operations property tax purposes enter into an agreement with the applicant in order for the applicant to receive a limitation from that school district nor the terms of such an agreement.
C.S.H.B. 2826 makes these provisions applicable to an identically situated project that is located in multiple contiguous school districts to which statutory provisions relating to a limitation on the appraised value of property in strategic investment areas or certain rural school districts apply in the same manner as the bill's provisions relating to the limitation on appraised value of certain property used to create jobs apply, except that, for purposes of determining the required minimum qualified investment and the minimum amount of a limitation on appraised value, the project is considered to be located in the school district in which the project is located that has the highest taxable value of industrial property for the preceding tax year, as determined by the comptroller.
|
||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2015.
|
||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 2826 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||
|