By: Miles H.B. No. 2930
 
 
 
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 
AN ACT
  relating to procedures for asserting taking claims arising from the
  enforcement of health and safety laws.
         BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
         SECTION 1.  Title 5, Civil Practice and Remedies Code, is
  amended by adding Chapter 112 to read as follows:
  CHAPTER 112.  PROCEDURES FOR TAKING CLAIMS ARISING FROM
  ENFORCEMENT OF HEALTH AND SAFETY LAWS
         Sec. 112.001.  DEFINITIONS.
         (a)  In this chapter:
               (1)  "Affected parties" means the claimant and the
  governmental entity who are directly affected by an act or
  agreement required or permitted by this chapter and does not
  include other parties to an action who are not directly affected by
  that particular act or agreement.
               (2)  "Claimant" means a person, including a decedent's
  estate, seeking recovery of damages or injunctive relief in a
  taking claim.  All persons claiming to have sustained damages as the
  result of a taking are considered a single claimant.
               (3)  "Defendant" means a governmental entity against
  whom a taking claim is asserted.  The term includes a third-party
  defendant, cross-defendant, or counterdefendant.
               (4)  "Economic damages" has the same meaning as in
  Section 41.001.
               (5)  "Expert" means a person giving opinion testimony
  who is qualified to do so under the Texas Rules of Evidence.
               (6)  "Expert report" means a written report by an
  expert providing a fair summary of the expert's opinion(s) as of the
  date of the report, which report shall provide:
                     (A)  if the claim alleges that the taking has
  denied the owner all economically viable use of the property, a
  statement that the expert has concluded the taking has denied the
  owner of such use, together with a statement of the facts on which
  the expert relied in reaching the said conclusion;
                     (B)  if the claim alleges that the taking has made
  the property unusable for its intended purpose, a statement that
  the expert has concluded the taking has made the property unusable
  for its intended purpose, together with a statement of the facts on
  which the expert relied in reaching the said conclusion;
                     (C)  if the claim alleges that the taking has
  interfered with the owner's investment-back expectations, a
  statement that the expert has concluded the taking interfered with
  such expectations, together with a statement of the facts on which
  the expert relied in reaching the said conclusion; and
                     (D)  if the claim alleges that an owner has
  sustained economic damages as a result of the taking:
                           (i)  a statement that the expert has
  concluded the taking has resulted in economic damages sustained by
  the owner as a result of the taking;
                           (ii)  a good-faith estimate of the amount of
  the said damages;
                           (iii)  a statement of the facts on which the
  expert relied in making the good-faith estimate; and
                           (iv)  an explanation of why the said damages
  are not de minimis when compared to the benefit, if any, to the
  public resulting from the taking.
               (7)  "Governmental entity" has the same meaning as in
  Section 2007.002, Government Code.
               (8)  "Owner" has the same meaning as in Section
  2007.002, Government Code.
               (9)  "Taking" has the same meaning as in Section
  2007.002, Government Code.
               (10)  "Taking claim" means a cause of action against a
  governmental entity for a taking.
         (b)  Any legal term or word of art used in this chapter, not
  otherwise defined in this chapter, shall have such meaning as is
  consistent with common law.
         Sec. 112.002.  NOTICE OF TAKING CLAIM.
         (a)  Any person or his authorized agent asserting a taking
  claim shall give written notice of such claim by certified mail,
  return receipt requested, to the governmental entity against which
  such claim is being made at least 60 days before the filing of a suit
  in any court based upon a taking claim.
         (b)  The notice required by Subsection (a) shall:
               (1)  State the sender's mailing address;
               (2)  Describe in reasonable detail the facts supporting
  the claim; and
               (3)  Be delivered in person, by third-party delivery,
  or by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the person
  described in Section 101.102(c) to receive service of citation in
  suits under Chapter 101.
         (c)  In pleading subsequently filed in any court, each party
  asserting a taking claim shall state that it has complied fully with
  the provisions of this section and shall provide such evidence
  thereof as the judge of the court may require to determine if the
  provisions of this chapter have been met.
         (d)  Notice given as provided in this chapter shall toll the
  applicable statute of limitations to and including a period of 75
  days following the giving of the notice, and this tolling shall
  apply to all parties and potential parties.
         Sec. 112.003.  RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF TAKING CLAIM.
         (a)  No fewer than 45 days after receipt of a notice required
  by Section 112.002(a), the governmental entity shall deliver to the
  sender in person, by third-party delivery, or by certified mail,
  return receipt requested, a response stating whether or not the
  governmental entity contends in good faith that one or more of the
  facts described by the claimant in the notice required by Section
  112.002(a) were the result of the governmental entity's enforcement
  of one or more laws enacted for the protection of public health or
  safety and, if yes, identifying the said law or laws.
         (b)  If the response required by Subsection (a) does not
  state that one or more of the facts described in the claimant's
  notice were the result of the governmental entity's enforcement of
  one or more laws enacted for the protection of public health or
  safety, Section 112.004 does apply to the taking claim.
         Sec. 112.004.  EXPERT REPORT.
         (a)  If a pleading of a claimant filed in any court may be
  fairly construed to make one or more of the allegations described in
  Section 112.001(a)(6), the claimant shall, not later than the 120th
  day after the date the original petition is filed, serve on each
  party or the party's attorney one or more expert reports, with a
  curriculum vitae of each expert listed in the report, for each
  governmental entity against which a taking claim is asserted.  The
  date for serving the report may be extended by written agreement of
  the affected parties.  Each defendant whose conduct is implicated
  in a report must file and serve any objection to the sufficiency of
  the report not later than the 21st day after the date it was served,
  failing which all objections are waived.
         (b)  If, as to a defendant, an expert report has not been
  served within the period specified by Subsection (a), the court, on
  the motion of the affected governmental entity, shall, subject to
  Subsection (c), enter an order that:
               (1)  awards to the affected governmental entity
  reasonable attorney's fees and costs of court incurred by the
  governmental entity; and
               (2)  dismisses the claim with respect to the
  governmental entity, with prejudice to the refiling of the claim.
         (c)  If an expert report has not been served within the
  period specified by Subsection (a) because elements of the report
  are found deficient, the court may grant one 30-day extension to the
  claimant in order to cure the deficiency.  If the claimant does not
  receive notice of the court's ruling granting the extension until
  after the 120-day deadline has passed, then the 30-day extension
  shall run from the date the plaintiff first received the notice.
         (d)  Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, a
  claimant may satisfy any requirement of this section for serving an
  expert report by serving reports of separate experts regarding
  different issues related to the taking claim.
         (e)  A court shall grant a motion challenging the adequacy of
  an expert report only if it appears to the court, after hearing,
  that the report does not represent a good faith effort to comply
  with the definition of an expert report in Section 112.001.
         (f)  Until a claimant has served the expert report and
  curriculum vitae as required by Subsection (a), all discovery in a
  taking claim is stayed except for the acquisition by the claimant of
  information by means of:
               (1)  written discovery as defined in Rule 192.7, Texas
  Rules of Civil Procedure;
               (2)  depositions on written questions under Rule 200,
  Texas Rules of Civil Procedure; and
               (3)  discovery from nonparties under Rule 205, Texas
  Rules of Civil Procedure.
         (g)  Notwithstanding any other provision of this section,
  after a taking claim is filed, all claimants, collectively, may
  take not more than two depositions before the expert report is
  served as required by Subsection (a).
         Sec. 112.005.  APPEAL FROM INTERLOCUTORY ORDER.
         (a)  A governmental entity may appeal from an interlocutory
  order of a court that:
               (1)  denies a motion for summary judgment filed in good
  faith by the government entity on one or more elements of a taking
  claim; or
               (2)  denies a motion filed in good faith by the
  governmental entity under Section 112.004(b).
         (b)  An interlocutory appeal under Subsection (a) stays all
  other proceedings in the trial court pending resolution of that
  appeal.
         Sec. 112.006.  ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION.  Chapter 154
  applies to a taking claim.
         SECTION 2.  This Act takes effect September 1, 2013.