This website will be unavailable from Friday, April 26, 2024 at 6:00 p.m. through Monday, April 29, 2024 at 7:00 a.m. due to data center maintenance.

 
 
  H.B. No. 9
 
 
 
 
AN ACT
  relating to student success-based funding for and reporting
  regarding public institutions of higher education.
         BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
         SECTION 1.  This Act shall be known as the Higher Education
  Outcomes-Based Funding Act.
         SECTION 2.  Section 61.059, Education Code, is amended by
  amending Subsections (a) and (c) and adding Subsection (b-1) to
  read as follows:
         (a)  To finance a system of higher education and to secure an
  equitable distribution of state funds deemed to be available for
  higher education, the board shall perform the functions described
  in this section. Funding policies shall:
               (1)  allocate resources efficiently and provide
  incentives for programs of superior quality and for institutional
  diversity;
               (2)  provide incentives for supporting the five-year
  master plan developed and revised under Section 61.051; [and]
               (3)  discourage unnecessary duplication of course
  offerings between institutions and unnecessary construction on any
  campus; and
               (4)  emphasize an alignment with education goals
  established by the board.
         (b-1)  A committee under Subsection (b) must be composed of
  representatives of a cross-section of institutions representing
  each of the institutional groupings under the board's
  accountability system. The commissioner of higher education shall
  solicit recommendations for the committee's membership from the
  chancellor of each university system and from the president of each
  institution of higher education that is not a component of a
  university system. The chancellor of a university system shall
  recommend to the commissioner at least one institutional
  representative for each institutional grouping to which a component
  of the university system is assigned. The president of an
  institution of higher education that is not a component of a
  university system shall recommend to the commissioner at least one
  institutional representative for the institutional grouping to
  which the institution is assigned.
         (c)  Formulas for basic funding shall:
               (1)  reflect the role and mission of each institution;
               (2)  [, shall] emphasize funding elements that directly
  support faculty;
               (3)  [, and shall] reflect both fixed and variable
  elements of cost; and
               (4)  incorporate, as the board considers appropriate,
  goals identified in the board's long-range statewide plan developed
  under Section 61.051.
         SECTION 3.  Subchapter C, Chapter 61, Education Code, is
  amended by adding Section 61.0593 to read as follows:
         Sec. 61.0593.  STUDENT SUCCESS-BASED FUNDING
  RECOMMENDATIONS. (a) The legislature finds that it is in the
  state's highest public interest to evaluate student achievement at
  institutions of higher education and to develop higher education
  funding policy based on that evaluation. Funding policies that
  promote postsecondary educational success based on objective
  indicators of relative performance, such as degree completion
  rates, are critical to maintaining the state's competitiveness in
  the national and global economy and supporting the general welfare
  of this state. Therefore, the purpose of this section is to ensure
  that institutions of higher education produce student outcomes that
  are directly aligned with the state's education goals and economic
  development needs.
         (b)  In this section:
               (1)  "At-risk student" means an undergraduate student
  of an institution of higher education:
                     (A)  who has been awarded a grant under the
  federal Pell Grant program; or
                     (B)  who, on the date the student initially
  enrolled in the institution:
                           (i)  was 20 years of age or older;
                           (ii)  had a score on the Scholastic
  Assessment Test (SAT) or the American College Test (ACT) that was
  less than the national mean score for students taking that test;
                           (iii)  was enrolled as a part-time student;
  or
                           (iv)  had not received a high school diploma
  but had received a high school equivalency certificate within the
  last six years.
               (2)  "Critical field" means a field of study designated
  as a critical field under Subsection (c).
         (c)  Except as otherwise provided under Subdivision (2), the
  fields of engineering, computer science, mathematics, physical
  science, allied health, nursing, and teaching certification in the
  field of science or mathematics are critical fields. Beginning
  September 1, 2012, the board, based on the board's determination of
  those fields of study in which the support and development of
  postsecondary education programs at the bachelor's degree level are
  most critically necessary for serving the needs of this state, by
  rule may:
               (1)  designate as a critical field a field of study that
  is not currently designated by this subsection or by the board as a
  critical field; or
               (2)  remove a field of study from the list of fields
  currently designated by this subsection or by the board as critical
  fields.
         (d)  This subsection applies only to a general academic
  teaching institution other than a public state college.  In
  devising its funding formulas and making its recommendations to the
  legislature relating to institutional appropriations of funds
  under Section 61.059 for institutions to which this subsection
  applies, the board, in the manner and to the extent the board
  considers appropriate and in consultation with those institutions,
  shall incorporate the consideration of undergraduate student
  success measures achieved during the preceding state fiscal
  biennium by each of the institutions. At the time the board makes
  those recommendations, the board shall also make recommendations
  for incorporating the success measures, to the extent the board
  considers appropriate in consultation with those institutions,
  into the distribution of any incentive funds available for those
  institutions, including performance incentive funds under
  Subchapter D, Chapter 62. The board's recommendations must provide
  alternative approaches for applying the success measures and must
  compare the effects on funding of applying the success measures
  within the formula for base funding to applying the success
  measures as a separate formula. The success measures considered by
  the board under this subsection may include:
               (1)  the total number of bachelor's degrees awarded by
  the institution;
               (2)  the total number of bachelor's degrees in critical
  fields awarded by the institution;
               (3)  the total number of bachelor's degrees awarded by
  the institution to at-risk students; and
               (4)  as determined by the board, the six-year
  graduation rate of undergraduate students of the institution who
  initially enrolled in the institution in the fall semester
  immediately following their graduation from a public high school in
  this state as compared to the six-year graduation rate predicted
  for those students based on the composition of the institution's
  student body.
         (e)  Notwithstanding Subsection (d):
               (1)  not more than 10 percent of the total amount of
  general revenue appropriations of base funds for undergraduate
  education recommended by the board for all institutions to which
  Subsection (d) applies for a state fiscal biennium may be based on
  student success measures; and
               (2)  the board's recommendation for base funding for
  undergraduate education based on student success measures does not
  reduce or otherwise affect funding recommendations for graduate
  education.
         (f)  This subsection applies only to public junior colleges,
  public state colleges, and public technical institutes. In
  devising its funding formulas and making its recommendations to the
  legislature relating to institutional appropriations of incentive
  funds for institutions to which this subsection applies, the board,
  in the manner and to the extent the board considers appropriate and
  in consultation with those institutions, shall incorporate the
  consideration of the undergraduate student success measures
  achieved during the preceding state fiscal biennium by each of the
  institutions. The success measures considered by the board under
  this subsection may include:
               (1)  the following academic progress measures achieved
  by students at the institution:
                     (A)  successful completion of:
                           (i)  developmental education in
  mathematics;
                           (ii)  developmental education in English;
                           (iii)  the first college-level mathematics
  course with a grade of "C" or higher;
                           (iv)  the first college-level English course
  with a grade of "C" or higher; and
                           (v)  the first 30 semester credit hours at
  the institution; and
                     (B)  transfer to a four-year college or university
  after successful completion of at least 15 semester credit hours at
  the institution; and
               (2)  the total number of the following awarded by the
  institution:
                     (A)  associate's degrees;
                     (B)  bachelor's degrees under Section 130.0012;
  and
                     (C)  certificates identified by the board for
  purposes of this section as effective measures of student success.
         (g)  Biennially, the board, in consultation with
  institutions to which Subsections (d) and (f) apply, shall review
  the student success measures considered by the board under those
  subsections.
         (h)  The board shall include in its findings and
  recommendations to the legislature under Section 61.059:
               (1)  an evaluation of the effectiveness of the student
  success measures described by this section in achieving the purpose
  of this section during the preceding state fiscal biennium; and
               (2)  any related recommendations the board considers
  appropriate.
         (i)  The board shall adopt rules for the administration of
  this section, including rules requiring each institution of higher
  education to submit to the board any student data or other
  information the board considers necessary for the board to carry
  out its duties under this section.
         SECTION 4.  Subchapter C, Chapter 61, Education Code, is
  amended by adding Section 61.0905 to read as follows:
         Sec. 61.0905.  REPORTS TO JOINT OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE. (a)
  Not later than September 30, 2011, and subsequently not later than
  July 1, 2012, the board shall submit to the Joint Oversight
  Committee on Higher Education Governance, Excellence, and
  Transparency a written report reviewing, comparing, and
  highlighting national and global best practices on:
               (1)  improving student outcomes, including student
  retention, graduations, and graduation rates; and
               (2)  higher education governance, administration, and
  transparency.
         (b)  This section expires August 31, 2013.
         SECTION 5.  This Act takes effect immediately if it receives
  a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as
  provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this
  Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this
  Act takes effect September 1, 2011.
 
 
  ______________________________ ______________________________
     President of the Senate Speaker of the House     
 
 
         I certify that H.B. No. 9 was passed by the House on May 13,
  2011, by the following vote:  Yeas 118, Nays 22, 1 present, not
  voting; and that the House concurred in Senate amendments to H.B.
  No. 9 on May 27, 2011, by the following vote:  Yeas 127, Nays 14, 2
  present, not voting.
 
  ______________________________
  Chief Clerk of the House   
 
         I certify that H.B. No. 9 was passed by the Senate, with
  amendments, on May 24, 2011, by the following vote:  Yeas 30, Nays
  0.
 
  ______________________________
  Secretary of the Senate   
  APPROVED: __________________
                  Date       
   
           __________________
                Governor