TO: | Honorable John T. Smithee, Chair, House Committee on Insurance |
FROM: | John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board |
IN RE: | HB3 by Smithee (Relating to the operation and name of the Texas Windstorm Insurance Association and to the resolution of certain disputes concerning claims made to that association; providing penalties.), As Introduced |
Fiscal Year | Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds |
---|---|
2012 | $0 |
2013 | $0 |
2014 | $0 |
2015 | $0 |
2016 | $0 |
Fiscal Year | Probable Revenue Gain from Insurance Maint Tax Fees 8042 |
Probable (Cost) from Insurance Maint Tax Fees 8042 |
Probable Revenue Gain from Appropriated Receipts 666 |
Probable (Cost) from Appropriated Receipts 666 |
---|---|---|---|---|
2012 | $230,584 | ($230,584) | $942,709 | ($942,709) |
2013 | $314,280 | ($314,280) | $74,316 | ($74,316) |
2014 | $258,200 | ($258,200) | $0 | $0 |
2015 | $258,200 | ($258,200) | $0 | $0 |
2016 | $258,200 | ($258,200) | $0 | $0 |
Fiscal Year | Change in Number of State Employees from FY 2011 |
---|---|
2012 | 5.0 |
2013 | 4.0 |
2014 | 3.0 |
2015 | 3.0 |
2016 | 3.0 |
Based on the analysis provided by TDI, the expert panel would cost $50,000 to compensate members for the initial work performed in fiscal year 2012 and an additional $50,000 to compensate members for work performed following a storm. Since the timing, magnitude, location, and number of storms that might occur cannot be estimate, this analysis assumes one storm during the next five years, occurring in fiscal year 2013. These costs would be funded by General Revenue – Insurance Maintenance Tax.
Additionally, the bill would create new procedures and processes for TCIPA policyholders to obtain a review of a loss claim, request appraisal and the review by an independent review panel and judicial review. The bill requires the Commissioner of Insurance to appoint the independent review panel from a list of panel members created and published by TDI. The bill also provides for judicial review of the reviews by the appraisal, independent review panel and Association determinations. The bill would require the Commissioner to act and to assess the requests of any Association’s insureds to obtain relief regarding a claim or decision of the appraisal or panel. Based on the analysis provided by TDI, the agency will require 2.0 full-time-equivalent positions (FTEs), an Attorney IV and a Program Specialist II, for the processes for finalizing the reviews and gathering of information for executions of the reviews during a year without significant storms. The 2.0 FTEs would cost $129,220 in salaries and wages with benefits cost of $36,001, other operating expenses of $225, and telephone costs of $2,400 each fiscal year of 2012 through 2016. Additional one-time equipment costs would be $12,738 in fiscal year 2012. Based on the information provided by TDI, an additional FTE, an Attorney III, would be required during a year with a significant storm. Since the timing, magnitude, location, and number of storms that might occur cannot be estimated, this analysis assumes one storm during the next five years, occurring in fiscal year 2013. The additional 1.0 FTE would cost $69,552 in salaries and wages with associated benefits cost of $19,377, other operating expenses of $225, and telephone costs of $1,200 each fiscal year of 2013-2016. Additional one-time equipment cost would be $6,080 in fiscal year 2013. The total cost of the 2.0 FTEs in fiscal year 2012 would be $180,584 and the 3.0 FTEs in fiscal year 2013 would be $264,280. These costs would be funded by General Revenue – Insurance Maintenance Tax. Since insurance maintenance tax is self-leveling, this analysis assumes that the costs to implement this bill would come from fund balances or the maintenance tax would be set to recover a higher level of revenue.
Based on the analysis provided by the Sunset Advisory Commission (SAC), the change could provide a basis for spending in the 2012-13 biennium to cover the cost of the Sunset review, depending on the Legislature's determination of agencies scheduled for Sunset review for that biennium and subsequent biennia. According to current statute, the Association would be responsible for paying the costs incurred by the SAC in performing the review, meaning the review would not have a fiscal impact to the State whether it occurred in 2013 or 2015. Based on the analysis provided by the SAC, implementation of the bill would require 3.0 FTEs in fiscal year 2012 and 1.0 FTE in fiscal year 2013, to be funded with revenue from appropriated receipts received from the Association. The 3.0 FTEs in fiscal year 2012 would cost $148,177 in salaries and wages with associated benefits cost of $41,282, travel costs of $3,000, and other costs of $250. The total cost in fiscal year 2012 would be $192,709. The 1.0 FTE in fiscal year 2013 would cost $58,123 in salaries and wages with associated benefits cost of $16,193 for a total cost of $74,316.
The changes to the Insurance Code regarding the issuance of public securities will require the Texas Public Finance Authority (TPFA) to revise the commercial paper program documents prepared for the sale of Class 1 public securities. Additionally, revisions to the source of revenue for repayments of all classes of public securities will require TPFA to obtain a new opinion from bond counsel on whether debt can be issued as taxable or tax exempt. Based on the analysis provided by TPFA, implementation of the bill will cost $750,000 in fiscal year 2012 for professional services to revise the commercial paper program documents and to obtain a new opinion from bond counsel on all classes of public securities. If debt is issued, the cost would be reimbursed by proceeds for costs of the issuance. Since
the timing of a natural disaster that would require the issuance cannot be predicted, it is assumed that TCIPA will fund this cost in fiscal year 2012 and recoup the expense from a future debt issuance.
Based on the analysis by the Bond Review Board, the public securities are obligations solely of TCIPA and do not create a pledge, gift, or loan of the faith, credit, or taxing authority of this state. Since the issuance of TCIPA debt is not and may not constitute a legal or moral obligation of the state, it should have no direct impact on the fiscal health of the state.
Source Agencies: |
LBB Staff: | JOB, KJG, MW, CH
|