This website will be unavailable from Friday, April 26, 2024 at 6:00 p.m. through Monday, April 29, 2024 at 7:00 a.m. due to data center maintenance.

  81R4586 PEP-F
 
  By: Veasey H.B. No. 616
 
 
 
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 
AN ACT
  relating to a study regarding the effectiveness of the James Byrd
  Jr. Hate Crimes Act.
         BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
         SECTION 1.  Chapter 2, Code of Criminal Procedure, is
  amended by adding Article 2.212 to read as follows:
         Art. 2.212.  STUDY OF EFFECTIVENESS OF JAMES BYRD JR. HATE
  CRIMES ACT. (a)  The attorney general shall conduct a study to
  examine the success of Chapter 85 (H.B. 587), Acts of the 77th
  Legislature, Regular Session, 2001, and subsequent amendments to
  that chapter.
         (b)  To accumulate data for purposes of Subsection (a), the
  attorney general shall:
               (1)  conduct the study so that it identifies successful
  strategies for prosecuting crimes of bias or prejudice and any
  barriers or obstacles to use of the hate crimes law;
               (2)  examine the characteristics of crimes reported as
  crimes of bias or prejudice and categorize each crime by:
                     (A)  type;
                     (B)  severity;
                     (C)  year of commission;
                     (D)  any protected class status of the victim;
                     (E)  any protected class status of the alleged
  perpetrator; and
                     (F)  any other factor that would assist in
  improving the effectiveness of the hate crimes law;
               (3)  for each crime identified under Subdivision (2),
  examine:
                     (A)  whether an affirmative finding under the hate
  crimes law was requested and obtained;
                     (B)  whether a protective order was requested and
  obtained;
                     (C)  whether other charges related to the incident
  were filed;
                     (D)  whether other convictions were obtained; and
                     (E)  if no affirmative finding was requested:
                           (i)  whether the alleged perpetrator was
  ever identified;
                           (ii)  whether there was any basis found for
  the affirmative finding or other charge; and
                           (iii)  whether a victim declined to
  participate in the investigation;
               (4)  survey county attorneys, district attorneys, and
  criminal district attorneys in whose jurisdictions complaints of
  crimes of bias or prejudice have been made and determine:
                     (A)  the characteristics of crimes leading to
  requests for affirmative findings under the hate crimes law;
                     (B)  whether there are barriers or disincentives
  discouraging requests for affirmative findings; and
                     (C)  whether the availability of additional
  resources would lead to a greater number of requests for
  affirmative findings;
               (5)  interview a representative sample of victims of
  crimes recorded as crimes of bias or prejudice and examine their
  experiences with the hate crimes prosecution process to determine
  problems, burdens, or disincentives to the prosecution of hate
  crimes;
               (6)  for Section 22.111, Government Code, examine:
                     (A)  the amount of money appropriated for
  prosecutorial training;
                     (B)  how many training sessions were provided;
                     (C)  how many training sessions were requested;
  and
                     (D)  the number of attendees of any training
  sessions provided;
               (7)  for Article 104.004 of this code, examine:
                     (A)  the amount of money appropriated;
                     (B)  the number of requests made for money and the
  amounts requested; and
                     (C)  the total amount of money distributed;
               (8)  for Section 29.905, Education Code, examine:
                     (A)  the amount of money appropriated for
  community and public curricula;
                     (B)  the results of any curriculum feedback model;
                     (C)  the number of requests for a curriculum;
                     (D)  when a curriculum was developed; and
                     (E)  the amount of any actual instruction under a
  curriculum; and
               (9)  compare data regarding crimes of bias or prejudice
  under state law, federal law, and the law of other states,
  including:
                     (A)  reporting requirements;
                     (B)  the number of complaints made;
                     (C)  the number of prosecutions;
                     (D)  money available for prosecutions;
                     (E)  money available for education; and
                     (F)  other models for prosecution of, or education
  about, crimes of bias or prejudice.
         (c)  Not later than January 1, 2011, the attorney general
  shall deliver a report to each house of the legislature on the data
  collected under Subsection (b).
         (d)  This article expires February 1, 2011.
         SECTION 2.  This Act takes effect immediately if it receives
  a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as
  provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution.  If this
  Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this
  Act takes effect September 1, 2009.